CIRCULAR ECONOMY APPROACHES MODEL FOR CERAMIC-WASTE AGGREGATE CONCRETE

Authors
  • Israa Hussein Ali

    Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Babylon, Babylon 51001, Iraq

    Author

Keywords:
Circular economy model (CEM); ceramic waste (CW); recycled aggregate concrete.
Abstract

Substitution of virgin aggregate with processed ceramic waste (CW) may support circular building. Yet, a high substitution does not assure mechanically feasible or ecologically preferable concrete. Here, we provide a quantitative Circular Economy Approaches Model that combines material-loop closure, cradle-to-gate environmental indicators, aggregate-system economics, and mechanical-performance protections for ceramic-waste aggregate concrete. The experimental database was obtained from published work and consisted of a natural-aggregate control and eight mixes where the CW replaced 25–100% of the fine or coarse aggregate individually. Mass-balance equations evaluated ceramic-waste diversion, avoided virgin-aggregate consumption, and circular material percentage for a functional unit of 1 m3 of concrete, whereas benchmark-calibrated computations calculated global-warming potential, embodied energy, and aggregate-system cost. The measured 7- and 28-day compressive, splitting-tensile and flexural strengths were used in a control normalized mechanical-performance index. The findings indicated that the best-balanced combination is FA3 with 75% substitution of ceramic-sand. FA3 reached compressive strength of 39.14 MPa, splitting-tensile strength of 3.50 MPa, flexural strength of 4.38 MPa and the greatest mechanical-performance index of 1.117 after 28 days. The combination reused 450 kg/m³ of CW, substituting an equal amount of natural sand and reaching a circular material share of 32.14%. The benchmark-calibrated scenario resulted in a 17.71% reduce in global-warming potential, a 15.07% decrease in embodied energy, and a 38.63% reduction in aggregate-system cost compared to the control. CA4, the option with the best mass-based circularity and theoretical environmental-economic savings, failed the required mechanical safeguard, thereby illustrating that maximal waste incorporation is not a sufficient optimization criteria.

References

[1] Y. Cheng, F. Huang, R. Liu, J. Hou, and G. Li, “Test research on effects of waste ceramic polishing powder on the permeability resistance of concrete,” Mater. Struct., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 729–738, 2016.

[2] S. A. Abdullah Anwar, S. Mohd, A. Husain, and S. A. Ahmad, “Replacement of cement by marble dust and ceramic waste in concrete for sustainable development,” Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 496–503, 2015.

[3] H. Patel, N. K. Arora, and S. R. Vaniya, “Use of ceramic waste powder in cement concrete,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 2015.

[4] M. Bhargav and R. Kansal, “Experimental investigation to substitute of cement with ceramic tiles powder in concrete,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 8, no. IX, pp. 302–307, 2020.

[5] L. G. Li, Z. Y. Zhuo, J. Zhu, J. J. Chen, and A. K. H. Kwan, “Reutilizing ceramic polishing waste as powder filler in mortar to reduce cement content by 33% and increase strength by 85%,” Powder Technol., vol. 355, pp. 119–126, 2019.

[6] F. Andreola, L. Barbieri, I. Lancellotti, M. C. Bignozzi, and F. Sandrolini, “New blended cement from polishing and glazing ceramic sludge,” Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 546–555, 2010.

[7] T. B. Pavesi, A. B. Rohden, and M. R. Garcez, “Supporting circular economy through the use of red ceramic waste as supplementary cementitious material in structural concrete,” J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2278–2296, 2021.

[8] P. R. de Matos et al., “Utilization of ceramic tile demolition waste as supplementary cementitious material: An early-age investigation,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 38, p. 102187, 2021.

[9] K. P. Manikandan, P. Nanthakumar, M. Balachandar, D. G. Shankar, and G. Vijayakumari, “Partial replacement of aggregate with ceramic tile in concrete,” Mater. Today Proc., 2023.

[10] I. Luhar et al., “Assessment of the suitability of ceramic waste in geopolymer composites: An appraisal,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 12, p. 3279, 2021.

Downloads
Published
2026-09-03
Section
Articles
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

CIRCULAR ECONOMY APPROACHES MODEL FOR CERAMIC-WASTE AGGREGATE CONCRETE. (2026). Eureka Journal of Civil, Architecture and Urban Studies, 2(9), 1-25. http://eurekaoa.com/index.php/8/article/view/1402