A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EVOLUTION OF BUILDING FAÇADES AND THEIR ROLE IN IMPROVING THERMAL COMFORT

Authors
  • Hiba A. AL-DULAIMI

    Dept. of Roads and Transportation Engineering-College of Engineering-University of Al-Qadisiyah

    Author

Keywords:
static, dynamic, passive, active, smart
Abstract

Façades (the outer "skins" of buildings) have transformed from passive static envelopes into intelligent, adaptive systems that regulate indoor–outdoor environments. With the growing use of façades in built space, façades are no longer the defining element of a building in terms of looks but also play an integral role in thermal performance of buildings as well as comfort of the occupants inside1. Architectural changes in durable materials and gadgets have led architects to move beyond conventional brute walls and immovable fenestration to versatile designs. In contrast, for instance, ventilated double-skin façades, moveable shading elements and smart glazing systems allow façades to adapt to the environmental conditions rather than resist 1. These high-performance façades are capable of modulating solar gain and natural ventilation to lower heating and cooling loads. Deploying such adaptive façades has been shown to reduce building energy use by up to ~50% and results in considerably better thermal comfort over static façades [3]. In principle, modern façades combine insulation, daylight control and even energy generation (for example, photovoltaic glazing) to enable buildings to come as close to Net-Zero Energy targets as possible [4,3].

References

1.A. Alothman, M. M. Alshamrani, and A. Alqahtani, “Analytical examination of dynamic elements in modern architectural façades for advanced structural aesthetics,” Frontiers in Built Environment, vol. 10, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2024.1302380.

2.M. M. Jafari, A. Bagheri, and S. H. Mousavi, “Energy-efficient building façades: A comprehensive review of innovative technologies and sustainable strategies,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 82, p. 108289, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108289.

3.S. Eltaweel and Y. Su, “Dynamic façades for sustainable buildings: Classification, applications, prospects and challenges,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 421, p. 139918, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139918.

4.

A. Attia, S. Bilir, and T. Göçer, “Net-zero energy buildings: Façade systems, design strategies and performance assessment,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 284, p. 112864, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112864.

5.M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

6.A. Kamali, H. Ghaffarianhoseini, and A. Ghaffarianhoseini, “A systematic review on the research and development of adaptive buildings,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 1593, 2025, doi: 10.3390/buildings15101593.

Downloads
Published
2026-04-09
Section
Articles
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EVOLUTION OF BUILDING FAÇADES AND THEIR ROLE IN IMPROVING THERMAL COMFORT. (2026). Eureka Journal of Civil, Architecture and Urban Studies, 2(4), 1-13. http://eurekaoa.com/index.php/8/article/view/761

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.