THE STUDY OF ZOOMORPHIC METAPHORS IN SCIENTIFIC SOURCES

Authors
  • Dildora Norkuziyeva

    Associate Professor of Samarkand Campus, University of Economics and Pedagogy, Samarkand, Uzbekistan

    Author

Keywords:
zoomorphic metaphor, metaphorical units, zoomorphic imagery, animal representation, metaphorical conceptualization, anthropocentrism, comparative analysis.
Abstract

Zoomorphic imagery has remained an integral component of literary expression from the culture of antiquity to the present day. Throughout different stages of human history, people's understanding and interpretation of the world were significantly influenced by their interactions with animals. By observing animals’ behavior, habits, physical appearance, and ways of life, humans gradually developed specific perceptions of various animal species as carriers of particular symbolic meanings and cultural representations. As human cognition evolved, these perceptions and attitudes toward animals underwent continuous transformation, giving rise to diverse cultural interpretations and symbolic associations. Over time, the emergence and further development of zoomorphic representations have led to the formulation of various theories concerning their origins, evolution, and perception in human consciousness across different historical periods. This article examines primitive conceptions of animals, the earliest manifestations of zoomorphism, and its various forms. It also explores the extent to which these representations were reflected in subsequent stages of cultural and linguistic development and how they were preserved in later periods of antiquity. Particular attention is paid to the historical continuity and cultural significance of zoomorphic imagery as a means of conceptualizing human experience and understanding the surrounding world.

References

1. Antanaitis I.R. Interpreting the Meaning of East Baltic Neolithic Symbols // Cambridge Archeological Journal. 1997. Vol. 7 (1).

2. Before the pyramids. The origins of Egyptian civilization / Ed. by E. Teeter. Chicago: The Oriental Institute, 2011. P. 79. 3. Djumabayeva J va boshqalar. Doston matnidagi zoomorfizmlar va ularning uslubiy xususiyatlari. “Oriental Art and Culture” scientific-methodical journal. 2020. 138 b.

2. Norkuziyeva D.Sh. Zoomorfizmlаrning etnolingvomadaniy xususiyatlari. Fan, ta’lim va amaliyot integratsiyasi. 327-331 b.

17. Norkuziyeva D.Sh. Bаdiiy аdаbiyotdа zoomorfizmlаrni qo‘llаnilishining o‘zigа xos xususiyatlari. Zamonaviy tilshunoslik va derivatsion qonuniyatlar. Respublika ilmiy-amaliy anjumani materiallari. - Samarqand: SamDCHTI nashri, 2022. – 147- 149 b. 3. Salimova Z. Тurk tilida zoonim va fitonimlar orqali inson qiyofasiga murojaatning o‘ziga xosliklari. “Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences” Scientific journal. 246 b.

4. Nurgazina, A., Sergeyeva, A., Omirzakova, M., Ravshanov, A., Ibragimov, l., & Usmanov, M. (2026). Barriers and Drivers of artificial intelligence integration in Geographical education: a comparative Study of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Ukrainian Geographical Journal. 1, 102–115. [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2026.01.102

5. Nurgazina , A. ., Ravshanov, A. ., Usmanov, M. ., Ibragimov, L., & Sergeyeva, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in geographical education of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan: Revolution of knowledge and approaches. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(2), 1797–1811. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.5546

Downloads
Published
2026-06-08
Section
Articles
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

THE STUDY OF ZOOMORPHIC METAPHORS IN SCIENTIFIC SOURCES. (2026). Eureka Journal of Language, Culture & Social Change, 2(6), 260-271. https://eurekaoa.com/index.php/3/article/view/1247