PHILOSOPHICAL-AESTHETIC CONCEPT AND THE HARMONY OF ARTISTIC MASTERY IN A POETESS’S EPIC POEMS
- Authors
-
-
Maxliyo Axmadaliyeva
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Philology, Acting Associate Professor Tashkent University of Humanities, Department of Pedagogy and Languages
Author
-
- Keywords:
- Education, learning, Communication, (HEIs), cyberpedagogy, curriculum, skills, psychology, linguistics, constructivism, learning models.
- Abstract
-
The article studies the epic skill of the outstanding Uzbek poet Zulfiya, philosophical-aesthetic concepts and features of artistic style in her works. The author, while touching upon the theoretical foundations of the epic genre, analyzes the division of this genre into lyrical, epic and dramatic types in modern literary criticism. In the poet's work, especially after the death of Hamid Olimjon, the focus is on the deep penetration into the human psyche, the intensification of the motifs of separation and exile. The article, using the example of the epic "Mushoira", illuminates the poet's views on patriotism, friendship of peoples and human freedom through the experiences of the lyrical hero.
- References
-
1. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson Longman.
2. Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
3. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.4. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
5. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
6. Liddicoat, A. J., Scarino, A., & Kohler, M. (Eds.). (2014). Languages education in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
7. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
8. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
9. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
10. Swain, M. (2013). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. Routledge.
11. Biesenbach-Lucas, S., & Weasenforth, D. (2001). Teaching oral communication in graduate science education: A survey of professors and instructional practices. English for Specific Purposes, 20(4), 333-349.
12. Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., ... & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 1(1), 010103.
13. Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469-483.
14. Hwang, G. J., & Wu, P. H. (2014). Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: A review of 2008-2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 83-95.
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-04-24
- Issue
- Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
