STAFF COMPOSITION AND PROFESSIONAL MISMATCH IN CULTURAL CENTERS OF UZBEKISTAN
- Authors
-
-
Jamshid Khamzaevich Khalilov
Head of the Department of Strategic Planning and Methodology, Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Author
-
- Keywords:
- Cultural centers, staff composition, professional mismatch, cultural sector, personnel policy.
- Abstract
-
This scientific article analyzes the staff composition of cultural centers in Uzbekistan, the distribution of employees according to their professional specializations, and the existing mismatch between workforce qualifications and institutional needs. The study was conducted based on the IMRAD methodological model, and empirical data were collected through surveys, interviews, and document analysis. The findings reveal a shortage of creative specialists, an excessive share of administrative personnel, and weaknesses in the professional development system within cultural centers. The scientific conclusions and practical recommendations are aimed at improving personnel policy in the cultural sector.
- References
-
1.Decrees and resolutions of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan concerning culture and the arts. — Tashkent.
2.Resolutions of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan concerning culture and the arts. — Tashkent.
3.Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Regulatory and legal documents on the activities of cultural centers. — Tashkent.
4.State Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Statistical data on culture and the arts. — Tashkent.
5.Abdurahmonov, Q.X. (2018). Labor Economics and Human Resource Management. Tashkent: Iqtisodiyot.
6.Rasulov, A., & Karimov, B. (2020). Issues of Managing Human Resource Capacity in Cultural Institutions. Culture and Art Journal, 3(1), 45–52.
7.Xolmatov, S. (2019). Development of Human Capital in the Cultural Sector. Tashkent: Fan va Texnologiya.
8.DeVereaux, C. (2009). Cultural Management and Policy. London: Routledge.
9.Throsby, D. (2010). The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.Holden, J. (2006). Cultural Value and the Crisis of Legitimacy. London: Demos.
11.UNESCO. (2013). Creative Economy Report. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
12.Towse, R. (2011). A Handbook of Cultural Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
13.Oakley, K., & O’Connor, J. (2015). The Routledge Companion to the Cultural Industries. London: Routledge.
14.Tashpulatova, D., & Siddiqova, I. (2021, April). A CRITIQUE OF THE VIEW OF ANTONYMY AS A RELATION BETWEEN WORD FORMS. In Конференции.
15.Тошпулатова, Д. Х. (2019). ПОНЯТИЕ И ВИДЫ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИХ КОНЦЕПЦИЙ ОБУЧЕНИЯ ИНОСТРАННОМУ ЯЗЫКУ. АНАЛИЗ СОВРЕМЕННЫХ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИХ КОНЦЕПЦИЙ. Вопросы педагогики, (7-2), 118-121.
16.ТАШПУЛАТОВА, Д. PRAGMATIC APHORISMS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH FEATURE AND THE PRINCIPLES OF THEIR TRANSMISSION IN THE CORPUS. СООТНОШЕНИЕ ПАРАЛИНГВИСТИКИ И РЕЧЕВОГО ЭТИКЕТА В РАЗНЫХ ЛИНГВОКУЛЬТУРАХ.
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-06-06
- Issue
- Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
