INFLUENCE OF THE COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF POLYMER-BASED BIOCOMPOSITES ON THEIR MECHANICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES
- Authors
-
-
Dilnoza A. Egamnazarova
1st Year Master's Student Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Author
-
- Keywords:
- Biocomposites, polymer matrix, PLA, PCL, PEEK, hydroxyapatite, interfacial adhesion, porosity, biocompatibility.
- Abstract
-
This article presents a detailed analysis of the factors determining the mechanical and biological properties of polymer-matrix biocomposites. The performance of these materials depends not on a single parameter, but on a complex set of interrelated characteristics, including the type of polymer matrix, the nature of the filler, its particle size and distribution, the quality of interfacial adhesion, the porous architecture of the material, and its degradation behavior over time. A comparative assessment was carried out for systems based on PLA, PCL, and PEEK, as well as for composites containing hydroxyapatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, collagen, or cellulose fibers. For bone tissue engineering, the most important properties are stiffness (elastic modulus), compressive strength, osteoconductivity, and structural stability. For materials intended for soft tissue engineering, greater importance is attached to elasticity, surface hydrophilicity, and the ability to promote cell adhesion. It is concluded that purposeful control of the composition and internal structure of a biocomposite makes it possible to achieve the required balance between mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and controlled degradability.
- References
-
1. Omigbodun, F. T., et al. Exploring the frontier of polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite composites in bone regeneration. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 2024.
2. Liang, H. Y., et al. Polycaprolactone in bone tissue engineering. Bioengineering, 2024.
3. Zheng, W., et al. Current developments and prospects of orthopedic implants. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2024.
4. Dulak, A., et al. Recent advances in PEEK for biomedical applications. Polymers, 2025.
5. Petousis, M., et al. 3D printing of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Bioprinting, 2024.
6. Subramaniyan, M., et al. Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of PLA composites reinforced with hydroxyapatite. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2024.
7. Wang, Z. F., et al. 3D-printed bionic polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Polymers, 2025.
8. Qiu, B., et al. Improving osteointegration and antibacterial properties of PEEK implants by surface modification. Biomedical Materials, 2024.
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-04-20
- Issue
- Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Similar Articles
- Boburjon Kholmakmatov, PLANNING AND PERIODIZATION OF THE TRAINING PROCESS , Eureka Journal of Computing Science & Digital Innovation: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026)
- Kobilov Komronbek Erkinovich, Fazliddin Arzikulov, IOT-BASED REMOTE MONITORING FOR RURAL AREAS: A LOW-COST PLATFORM FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH , Eureka Journal of Computing Science & Digital Innovation: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026)
- Adhamjon Mamajonov, USING DIGITAL TOOLS AND ONLINE PLATFORMS FOR TEACHING COMPUTER SKILLS IN TECHNICAL COLLEGES , Eureka Journal of Computing Science & Digital Innovation: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.








