THE DISTINCTIVE NATURE OF RIDDLES AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION: A COGNITIVE AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Authors
  • Safayeva Mamura Okil kizi

    National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek Department of Translation Studies and Comparative Linguistics

    Author

Keywords:
This study differentiates riddles from other folk genres, such as proverbs and folktales, by analyzing their unique cognitive and structural characteristics. Through an examination of key theoretical frameworks, the paper identifies the riddle’s reliance on semantic ambiguity, inferential reasoning, and the subversion of cognitive scripts as its defining features. The paper further presents a classification system for riddles based on their linguistic mechanisms, thematic content, and the cognitive challenges they present, attributing the theoretical underpinnings to various established scholars. It concludes that the riddle’s distinctiveness lies in its compact, paradoxical formulation designed to activate associative thinking and intellectual surprise, serving as a vital genre for understanding human cognition and cultural transmission.
Abstract

This study differentiates riddles from other folk genres, such as proverbs and folktales, by analyzing their unique cognitive and structural characteristics. Through an examination of key theoretical frameworks, the paper identifies the riddle’s reliance on semantic ambiguity, inferential reasoning, and the subversion of cognitive scripts as its defining features. The paper further presents a classification system for riddles based on their linguistic mechanisms, thematic content, and the cognitive challenges they present, attributing the theoretical underpinnings to various established scholars. It concludes that the riddle’s distinctiveness lies in its compact, paradoxical formulation designed to activate associative thinking and intellectual surprise, serving as a vital genre for understanding human cognition and cultural transmission.

References

1. Bartlett F. C. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932

2. Brown G. & Yule G. Discourse Analysis. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983

3. Christie N. The Riddles of the World. - New York: New York University Press, 2001

4. Galperin I. R. Stylistics (Стилистика). - Moscow: Higher School Publishing House, 1977

5. Husainova Z. O‘zbek xalq og‘zaki poetik ijodi: Topishmoqlar (Uzbek Folk Oral Poetic Creation: Riddles). - Toshkent: Fan nashriyoti, 1981.

6. Lakoff G. & Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. - Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1981

7. Mednick S. A. "The associative basis of the creative process". Psychological Review, 69(3), 1962

8. Opie I. & Opie P. The Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1951

9. Schank R. C. & Abelson R. P. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977

10.Tupper F. The Riddles of the Exeter Book. Boston: Ginn and Company / Project Gutenberg Edition, 1910.

Downloads
Published
2026-02-10
Section
Articles
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

THE DISTINCTIVE NATURE OF RIDDLES AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION: A COGNITIVE AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. (2026). Eureka Journal of Education & Learning Technologies, 2(2), 90-100. https://eurekaoa.com/index.php/2/article/view/379