METHODS OF ASSESSING QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR APPLYING THE INDONESIAN EXPERIENCE
- Authors
-
-
Zuxriddin Raup o‘g‘li Samandarov
Chief Specialist of the Department for Organization of Academic Activities, PhD Tashkent State University of Economics
Author
-
Zokir Mamadiyarov
Professor of the Department of Bank Accounting and Audit, DSc
Author
-
Og‘abek To‘qumbetov
Chief Specialist of the Department for Organization of Academic Activities
Author
-
- Keywords:
- Higher education quality, accreditation, BAN-PT, outcome-based education, institutional assessment, PDDikti system, Indonesian experience, Uzbek experience.
- Abstract
-
This article analyzes contemporary methodological approaches to assessing quality and effectiveness in the higher education system, international experience, and the accreditation and evaluation system of the Republic of Indonesia. The paper examines Indonesia’s BAN-PT (Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi) model, outcome-based education (OBE), and indicators of institutional effectiveness. It also presents opportunities for application and policy recommendations relevant to the higher education system of Uzbekistan.
- References
-
1. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.
2. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
4. BAN-PT. (2023). Laporan Tahunan Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi.
5. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi. (2022). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
6. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report: Technology in Education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
7. World Bank. (2023). Higher Education for Development: Learning Outcomes and Labor Markets. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
8. Directorate General of Higher Education Indonesia. (2023). Higher Education Statistical Yearbook 2023. Jakarta: Kemdikbudristek.
9. Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). The state and development prospects of higher education in Uzbekistan. Tashkent: Ministry publication.
10. QS World University Rankings. (2024). QS World University Rankings 2024. London: Quacquarelli Symonds Limited.
11. Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. (2024). Ranking Web of Universities: July 2024 Edition. Madrid: CSIC.
12. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Brussels: ENQA.
13. Sasmita, J., & Suki, N. M. (2015). Young consumers' insights on brand equity. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(3), 276-292.
14. Prasetyo, B. (2021). Reformasi Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 115-128.
15. Azimov, A. T., & Yusupov, B. R. (2023). Quality assurance in higher education: theory and practice. Tashkent: Akademiya Publishing.
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-03-30
- Issue
- Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
